"Is the Congregation to Hold Their Leadership Accountable?"
Polity is a term that theologians use to define how a local church’s government is structured, functions, and characterizes its leader/laity relationship. Churches can take on many forms of polity. There are three that are the most common among churches: 1. some churches are pastoral lead by one man only—you could say this would resemble a dictatorship or what I call a "Protestant Papacy"; 2. others are strictly lead through congregational-rule or voting on all church matters—very much akin to a democracy; and 3. those who govern by what has become known as elder-rule—this is a plurality of godly leaders that the church affirms to lead them. It is the last of these that I believe is the most biblical, balanced and honoring to the Lord.
Though elder-rule is a good biblical concept, the term can be misleading and doesn’t accurately represent the Scriptural heart of biblical leadership. “Rule” too many times suggests unquestioned authority, religious despotism, or spiritual heavy-handedness. However, the office and title of elder is quite different; it is one of servant-leadership. Paul says of himself in 1 Corinthians 4:1a, “Let a man regard us in this manner, as servants of Christ...” He uses a term for servant that suggests that he is appointed to the hardest of tasks, in the most difficult circumstances, away from the applause and adulation of men. He silences the sectarian admiration of the crowds in 1 Corinthians 3 by calling himself simply a servant; a bondservant of Christ. Peter emphasizes this as well and warns against an elder “lording over” the body of Christ when saying, “…exercising oversight... nor yet as lording it over those allotted to your charge, but proving to be examples to the flock.” (1 Peter 5:2b-3).
Guarding Against "Protestant Popery" and "Spiritual Abuse"
It is significant to note that a pastor of a church possesses no inherent authority over the church by virtue of office alone; it is only through that which Scripture affords him that gives him a position of authority. Where Scripture exhorts, he may exhort. Where Scripture calls for obedience, he is to call the church to obedience. Where Scripture edifies, he is to edify. And where Scripture commands, he is to command. But where Scripture is silent, he cannot be vocal and has no inherent authority. He may pray for the flock, he may give wisdom when weighing the facts or circumstances of a particular situation, he may counsel from the principals of the Word, but he possesses no authority. He, in other words, is to guard against spiritual abuse, by faithfully honoring and submitting to the Word of God by which he is thoroughly equipped for every good work (2 Timothy 3:16-17). And then in response to that truth, humbly serve the flock of God as an under-shepherd of Christ.
Spiritual abuse occurs when a leader uses his spiritual position to control or dominate another person absent from biblical wisdom, Christlike humility and the clear command of Scripture. At the very least this is legalistic pride on steroids--the doctrines of men instituted, accepted and embraced as biblical truth, yet, outside the pervue of God's holy Word. At the very most it is absolute power corrupting absolutely; this is the "Protestant Popery" that all pastors, elders and even influencial evangelical leaders need to be on guard against. Again, there is nothing inherent in the office of elder/pastor itself containing special rule or authority that he can exercise over the flock of God—-apart from the Scriptures, he is impotent to govern. Therefore, his greatest influence in the church occurs when his life is humbly lived in submission to Christ and His body; serving and caring for others as a faithful under-shepherd; adhering to the mandate of God’s Word; “proving to be an example to the flock.” Paul describes the pastor-servant’s character when he says, “And the Lord's bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged, with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition…” (2 Tim 2:24-25a).
Alexander Strauch in his masterful book, “Biblical Eldership,” gives these penetrating words of instruction:
"Following the biblical model, elders must not wield the authority given to them in a heavy-handed way. They must not use manipulative tactics, play power games, or be arrogant and aloof. They must never think that they are unanswerable to their fellow brethren or to God. Elders must not be authoritarian, which is incompatible with humble servanthood. When we consider Paul's example and that of our Lord's, we must agree that biblical elders do not dictate; they direct. True elders do not command the consciences of their brethren, but appeal to their brethren to faithfully follow God's Word.... They guard the community's liberty and freedom in Christ so that the saints are encouraged to develop their gifts, to mature, and to serve one another. "
In the great fourth chapter of Corinthians, Paul crescendos this unparalleled section on biblical ministry at verse five with these lucid words, “For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus as Lord; and ourselves as your bondservants for Christ sake.” He preaches not himself—how refreshing that is considering the times we live in; but only Christ Jesus as Lord. We call Him Christ because He is the sufficient Messiah who once for all atoned for our sins; we call Him Jesus because He is our Savior; and we call Him Lord because He is the one true Sovereign over all. In light of that, Paul humbled himself to the church; he was their bondservant for the glory of Christ. Paul was unmistakably a servant-leader.
Strauch continues his sagest instruction,
"Christ's presence is with the whole congregation, not just the elders. Christ ministers through all the members because all are Spirit -indwelt...." "As Christ’s undershepherds and God's stewards, the elders are under the strict authority of Jesus Christ and His holy Word. They are not a ruling oligarchy. They cannot do or say whatever they want. The church does not belong to the elders; it is Christ's church and God's flock. Thus the elders' leadership is to be exercised in a way that models Christlike, humble, loving leadership. In the local church, there are no rulers who sit above or subjects who stand below."
We usually think only in terms of Pastors, Elders, and Deacons holding the congregation accountable before the Lord—and rightly they should, but are you aware that the congregation has just as much a holy and necessary duty to hold the leadership of the church accountable to the Lord and His Word as well? Surprisingly, we do.
This article addresses five important areas of encouragement to church leadership that the body of Christ is responsible to do. No question, servant-leaders (pastors/elders) are held accountable for what they model and the way in which they teach and lead. This is why there are very specific qualifications for the two offices (elder and deacon) of leadership within the church (cp, 1 Timothy 3:1-10). But the congregation has its biblical role as well; and if we fail in our task, we are just as contributory to spiritual malpractice as the pastor/elder would be by abrogating his duty as an under-shepherd of Jesus Christ.
Let’s look at these five responsibilities of the church to its leadership.
1. Edify Through Prayer – (1 Timothy 2:1-3) ”First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men, 2 for kings and all who are in authority, in order that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity. 3 This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior.”
Prayer is the life-breath of the Christian. It signifies great dependence on our Lord for all things; conforms our will to His; gives us strength in the journey; protects the unity of the Spirit; keeps guard over an anxious heart; causes us not to faint in service to the Lord; brings glory to God; honors the Lord’s command; and develops humility and meekness in the believer of Jesus Christ. We are to “with all prayer and petition pray at all times in the Spirit, and with this in view, be on the alert with all perseverance and petition for all the saints” (Ephesians 6:18).
We are to be men and women of prayer for our pastors, elders, and deacons. Have you prayed faithfully for the leadership of your church? It is a privilege and a duty we should not take lightly. We should be “marching on our knees” for those given charge over our souls. “For the prayer of a righteous man accomplishes much…” (James 5:16). Paul asked for prayer on many occasions, 2 Thessalonians 3:1 says, “Finally, brethren, pray for us that the word of the Lord may spread rapidly and be glorified, just as it did also with you.” In 1 Thess.5:25 Paul encourages, “Brethren, pray for us.” And in 1 Thess. 5:13, 16-18 he says, “and that you esteem them [your pastors and elders] very highly in love because of their work; 16 Rejoice always; 17 pray without ceasing; 18 in everything give thanks; for this is God's will for you in Christ Jesus.” Even the writer of Hebrews gives this strong word of exhortation, “Pray for us, for we are sure that we have a good conscience, desiring to conduct ourselves honorably in all things” (Hebrews 13:18).
If you desire to minister to your leadership and hold them accountable to what God has called them to do, it begins with praying for them. If you haven’t been praying faithfully for your pastors or elders, begin today and let them know that everyday you are lifting their work, life and needs before the Lord. It will bless them beyond measure.
2. Examine Their Message – (Acts 17:11-12) “Now these were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily, to see whether these things were so. 12 Many of them therefore believed, along with a number of prominent Greek women and men.”
The second great honor for every Christian in holding the leadership of the church accountable is to examine what they are teaching with the Word of God. In other words, we should be discerning as God’s people with the words and content that anyone may teach. We should be effective “Bereans;” guarding the trust and truth by lovingly holding our elders accountable to its veracity. Loyalty should always first be to the Lord and His Word—never to the man, but always to the Master. If your pastors are “cutting it straight,” “rightly dividing the Word of truth,” “a workman unashamed approved unto God,” then you can rejoice in the Lord for them and their ministry in your life.
But because we are fallen people saved by grace, we need to stay open to the constructive criticisms of others—especially those who are teachers of the Word (James 3:1-2). It is possible that a pastor might even unwittingly be skewed or abhorrent in what he is teaching from the Word and needs the gentle yet faithful evaluation from the congregation.
In the above text, Paul called the Bereans of “more noble character” because they examined "whether these things (what Paul taught) were so" through the lens of truth--the Word of God. Implicitly, he not only thanks them, but admonishes them to do so. He strongly invites and welcomes scrutiny from those in the church. What humility; what teachability; what accountability. Remember beloved, error never wants to be challenged; truth will always desire examination. (Cp, Galatians 1:6-9).
the example of Paul
Think of it, here is Paul, the greatest pastor the church has ever known, writer of thirteen of the twenty-seven N.T. books; considered himself the chief of sinners and the least of all the apostles, but in reality was the greatest Apostle of the church; he spoke in divine revelation; communicated in infallible truth, did signs and wonders of an Apostle; saw the resurrected Christ in the flesh; and was appointed by Christ Himself for ministry. With credentials like that you might think there would be cause for boasting or an attitude of “don’t’ you know who I am”—but not with Paul. In utter meekness he says, “examine what I say with the Scriptures.” Oh how refreshing that is and how tragically absent it is from most pulpits today.
I have had pastors say to me, “who do these people think they are challenging me from the Scriptures? They have never been to seminary; they are not as studied as I; they are really ignorant of a deep knowledge of the Bible and, yet, they are trying to scrutinize me?” That’s actually happened. Listen, locking a man up in a seminary for four years, training him on key areas of language, church history, systematic theology, practical theology, and general Bible knowledge doesn’t necessarily make a pastor or produce a shepherd at the end of the day. Most will acknowledge, even in the best of scenarios, that the process is flawed and needs to be reexamined. In some very fine seminaries that I have been privileged to sing or speak, a lot of young men have gone from those learned institutions only to split a church within their first year of ministry. In other words, shepherds are born not in classrooms; but in the crucible of God’s sovereign choosing from within the local church. Seminary education is important; but it is only one dimensional. Pastors may say from the stage, “hold me accountable to what I teach; I desire to be truthful in all that I say.” We can’t judge motives; "love believes all things"; so we take them at their words—and fine words they are. But when you have to ask the pastor to rethink a position or prove from the Word of God his sermon to its veracity, you might be met with almost an offended look as opposed to a welcomed one. I have seen and experienced this first hand.
Dear men of God, if you have faithful “Bereans” in your church constantly plying you with questions, constantly examining you with the Word of God, constantly offering you from the well of careful learning a word of circumspection, don’t recoil at those parishioners, but thank the Lord for them for you are blessed. You might be tempted to say to some, “lighten up…back off…give me a break.” Don’t! I know that some elders look at people like this as being a nuisance, but they are really just fulfilling their biblical duty to you—and let them do this with joy. Paul says, “And for this reason we also constantly thank God that when you received from us the word of God's message, you accepted it not as the word of men, but for what it really is, the word of God, which also performs its work in you who believe” (1 Thessalonians 2:13).
3. Encourage Godly Character – (1 Timothy 3:1-7; Titus 1:5-8)
1 Timothy 3:1 "It is a trustworthy statement: if any man aspires to the office of overseer, it is a fine work he desires to do. 2 An overseer, then, must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money. 4 He must be one who manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with all dignity 5 (but if a man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he take care of the church of God?); 6 and not a new convert, lest he become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the devil. 7 And he must have a good reputation with those outside the church, so that he may not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil. 8 Deacons likewise must be men of dignity, not double-tongued, or addicted to much wine or fond of sordid gain, 9 but holding to the mystery of the faith with a clear conscience. 10 And let these also first be tested; then let them serve as deacons if they are beyond reproach."
Titus1:6 "namely, if any man be above reproach, the husband of one wife, having children who believe, not accused of dissipation or rebellion. 7 For the overseer must be above reproach as God's steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, not fond of sordid gain, 8 but hospitable, loving what is good, sensible, just, devout, self-controlled, 9 holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, that he may be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict.
The verses listed above are lengthy, but this third area of accountability is so vitally important that we need to read them again and again. Godly character in the ministry is essential and it is our duty to prayerfully be encouraging our pastors to live out by example all that the Holy Spirit has called and required them to be in their personhood daily. Pastors, like you and me, are sinners saved by grace; and it is only by grace that any of them can adhere faithfully to the qualifiers listed above. They are to be “above reproach” in life and doctrine. That means, free from accusation. It doesn’t mean perfect; sinless; without faults; without issues. But it does mean that they are free from accusations of a disqualifying nature.
Most pastors have tremendous issues, but feel trapped that they can’t be honest about them for fear of losing their position, respect, or influence among God’s people. One man may be great in the pulpit, but is absolutely lousy with relationships. Is he disqualified from serving as a pastor? One man may be a great counselor, but be very weak in areas of administration. Should he be disqualified from ministry? Another may be an excellent servant to others, but his pulpit work in the Word is less than to be desired. Should he be allowed to serve? We need to give grace to these dear men, beloved, for none of them do it all well or even biblically. They are still "under construction" in the fires of sanctification as you and I are. They need God’s grace to mold them and correct them in areas so as to become more effective and better shepherds. I am not suggesting we tolerate any patterns of sin—far from it. What I am suggesting in matters of character and ability that we are not to nag or nit-pick at our leadership—for that would be unkind, unprofitable and unloving to them (as well as to us). We are to encourage them in godliness and to maintain a good reputation within and beyond the walls of the church. Encourage them to watch their life and doctrine closely—to be an example to all the believers in speech, conduct, faith, love and purity (2 Tim. 2:22). “Faithful are the wounds of a friend…"(Proverbs 27:6). Amen?
4. Entreat Their Shepherding – (Hebrews 13:17) “Obey your leaders, and submit to them; for they keep watch over your souls, as those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with grief, for this would be unprofitable for you.”
In Biblical Eldership, Alexander Strauch says,
"Scripture also expressly commands the congregation to obey and submit to its spiritual leaders (Heb 13:17, James 5:5).....The requirement to submit, however, is not meant to suggest blind, mindless submission. Nor does it suggest that elders are above questioning or immune from public discipline (1Tim 5:19ff). The elders are most assuredly answerable to the congregation, and the congregation is responsible to hold its spiritual leaders accountable to faithful adherence to the truth of the Word."
There are three overarching duties that the elders are to have: prayer, ministry of the Word, and to shepherd God’s people. All other duties fall under those three general headings. The one of shepherding is of vital importance; it is the hardest to do and the most neglected. We are to honor, submit, obey, and give preference to the counsel and leadership of the elders of the church. We are to hold them in high regard and reward with double honor those who are faithful in sound doctrine and the discipleship of God’s people (Hebrews 13:17; 1 Timothy 5:17-19).
the business of the pastor
By definition, one of the titles of the elder is overseer (1 Timothy 3:1). The Greek word, episkopos, literally means to "look intently into the life of another" (1 Tim. 3:1); or "the careful watching over the soul--tirelessly keeping to one's post, forsaking rest or sleep to be a faithful watchman, as one who will give an account before the Lord of how they have looked after another believer in Christ" (Heb. 13:17). This selfless service to the body of Christ characterizes the under-shepherd of Christ more than any other singular thing. Good sermons, though important, are relatively easy to prepare in comparison—-commentaries don’t talk back to you, argue with you, cry with pain over the burdens of the day, stress you, wake you up at 2:00am with another issue to settle from someone's home, or having to walk through the discipline of one in enjoying unrepentant sin, etc. This is where you separate the men from the boys in pastoral ministry. If the pastors investment into the lives of God's people primarily or singularly resides around only sermon prep and exposition, then they have become nothing more than well-equipped "biblical motivational speakers." "Preach the Word" doesn't mean, "I don't have to shepherd the flock." Both are vital: sound doctrine preached; godly shepherding and discipleship tended to.
Or what if the pastors/elders are only there for the congregation during times of crisis, it doesn’t truly reflect the heart of the Lord for ministry, does it? Even unbelievers will demonstrate human kindness, care, and love for another stranger in times of great turmoil. 911 demonstrated that, didn’t it? The most wicked of men will even die for a cause or sacrifice their lives on a battle field, won’t they? But the under-shepherd of the Lord is not just about crisis management. In fact, if a pastor finds himself just going from crisis to crisis in his church, it is a telling mark that he is not invested with his people. If someone dies in the church or has been in a terrible accident, a faithful shepherd will be there—-for that matter anyone would. But that “emergency presence” doesn’t prove his life or calling. What really marks the man of God and maturity of the leadership of any church is how are they pro-actively invested in shepherding the flock of God when there is no crisis—-in the daily pots and pans of living. That is the distinguishing feature of the true overseer in the Lord. This is exhausting service; this is tireless expenditure of life for another; this is the hard-working farmer of 2 Timothy 2:6; this is the ministry!
Question: When was the last time you received a phone call, a letter or note, an impromptu visit from the pastors/elders of your church when there was no crisis and without you prompting it in anyway whatsoever? Sadly, I would say for most people the answer would be never. Failure in ministry usually occurs at the most fundamental levels and this is without question the weakest link in the chain for any church leadership.
he smells like sheep
When I was in New Jersey ministering in concert at a tremendous Pentecostal church a few years ago, I asked the head of the elder board to tell me about their senior pastor—what is he known for in his ministry. Without hesitation he said two things I have never forgotten: 1. he is faithful expositor of God’s Word; and, 2. he smells like sheep. What a great way to identify that this man was ministering faithfully among God’s people-—“he smells like sheep.” He didn’t smell like a board room, a class room, a golf course, etc. He smelled like the ones he was ministering too. That’s it friends. Oh for leadership that will invest pro-actively in the care, discipleship, and needs of the flock of God. Two books I would highly recommend you reading on this important subject and even consider giving to your pastors are: 1. “Pastoral Theology” by Thomas Murphy; and, 2. “The Genius of Puritanism” by Peter Lewis.
Oh to have pastors that can have these words carved above the doorposts of their study by those they are ministering to, “But we request of you, brethren, that you appreciate those who diligently labor among you, and have charge over you in the Lord and give you instruction, and that you esteem them very highly in love because of their work. Live in peace with one another” (1 Thess. 5:12-13).
5. Exhort the Unfaithful – (1 Timothy 5:19-21) "Do not receive an accusation against an elder except on the basis of two or three witnesses. Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning. I solemnly charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of His chosen angels, to maintain these principles without bias, doing nothing in a spirit of partiality."
Dr. John MacArthur has summed up so powerfully this duty to discipline and rebuke those in leadership when they are in sin from his N.T. commentary on 1 Timothy. Listen with fear and trembling to his words:
“Elders are to be protected from false accusations, but are not to receive immunity from true ones. Those elders who continue in sin must bear the consequences. Paul does not mention here any specific kinds of sin. Any sin [or pattern of unrepentant sin] that causes an elder to violate the qualifications listed in 3:2–7 would be grounds for rebuke in the presence of all. There are no elaborate steps of discipline to be followed. An accusation is made and confirmed [by two or three witnesses], then investigated; if found true, the elder is [to be] publicly rebuked. [The word Greek word for] rebuke means “to expose,” “to bring to open conviction,” “to correct,” or “to reprove.” There are no exegetical grounds for limiting all to the other elders. It means everyone, elders and congregation. A sinning elder has nowhere to hide.
The ministry is thus a two-edged sword. Those who serve faithfully are to be honored and protected, but those who sin are to be publicly rebuked. One of the purposes for that public rebuke is so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning… When one elder is publicly disgraced because of sin, that puts a healthy fear into the hearts of the others. It also puts that same fear into the hearts of the congregation (cf.. Matt. 18:17). [Godly] fear, along with love, is a proper motive for avoiding sin and obeying God (Deut. 13:6–11; 17:12– 13; 19:16–20; Acts 5:5–11). Proverbs 9:10 says, “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” Second Corinthians 7:1 admonishes believers to “cleanse [themselves] from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (cf.. Acts 9:31; Eph. 5:21; Heb. 12:28; 1 Peter 2:17). Such fear is not sheer terror, but rather a sense of the ominous reality of God’s hatred of evil.
The church needs to decide whether to protect man’s reputation, or God’s… Those who repent are to be forgiven and accepted by the congregation. That does not mean, however, they are to automatically be restored to ministry. Depending on the severity of the sin, they may be permanently disqualified…
The church must maintain these principles regarding sinning elders without bias, doing nothing in a spirit of partiality. No one is to receive preferential treatment. The rebuke of sinning elders must be done with accuracy and integrity. There must be no effort to protect those who are famous, specially gifted, or popular, nor to expose those who are not.”
Notwithstanding John’s powerful words above, this is not easy to apply or do. We can make the dogmatic statement on paper, but in reality where real people’s lives are at stake, relationships are strained and emotions running high, it can be a different more difficult thing altogether.
a cautious discipline
One word of caution here: Every little sin or character flaw that a pastor might have is not what’s in view here. Paul is giving general principals understanding that the kind of sin, its pattern and severity will govern much of what kind of discipline and rebuke is enforced. In some areas where the failings of the elder is not one of great severity (say as it would be with sexual sin) the discipleship of the pastor in bringing him to a place of a more proven character might be in order (as opposed to immediately moving to a public rebuke). This would demonstrate humility, submissive, repentance and restoration. We must all use godly wisdom; evaluating each case on its own merit. And like with the congregation, the purpose of confronting a sinning elder is not for a witch-hunt, powerplay, personal revenge or retribution. It's goal is always to see a man living holy before the Lord, honoring Him with a repentant life, and ultimately fit for the Master's use (2 Timothy 2).
"the Peter principle"
Here is an interesting example. Listen to the account of Peter when he was publicly rebuked by Paul for distorting the true gospel out of fear for those of the Circumcision. “But when [Peter] came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. 12 For prior to the coming of certain men from James, he used to eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he began to withdraw and hold himself aloof, fearing the party of the circumcision. 13 And the rest of the Jews joined him in hypocrisy, with the result that even Barnabas was carried away by their hypocrisy. 14 But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the gospel, I said to [Peter] in the presence of all, "If you, being a Jew, live like the Gentiles and not like the Jews, how is it that you compel the Gentiles to live like Jews? 15 "We are Jews by nature, and not sinners from among the Gentiles; 16 nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified. 17 "But if, while seeking to be justified in Christ, we ourselves have also been found sinners, is Christ then a minister of sin? May it never be!” (Galatians 2:11-17).
Peter was preaching a false gospel motivated by his personal fear of the Circumcision (similar to his fear of the crowds when denying Christ). Would you have him as your pastor? Would you dismiss him or disqualify him for heretical teaching or let him stay in ministry? Would you have disrobed him or challenged him as to his apostolic authority and credentials? Or maybe just put him on a probationary period of testing before he was allowed to be a spokesman for the Lord and His gospel in public ministry again? Sobering questions.
Interestingly, Paul does none of that; he rebuked him and Peter repented. Again, I am not suggesting that we tolerate sin or lower the standard of pastoral qualifications. But we do need to apply the wisdom of "grace and truth" in every situation before rashly dismissing a man, either temporarily or permanently, from ministry as a pastor.
In Conclusion:
As you can see, mutual accountability is vitally important in the body of Christ. Pray for your leaders, examine what they teach with God’s Word, encourage them in godly character, invite them to speak into your life and family, and, if necessary, rebuke and discipline a sinning pastor so that all may live in the fear of the Lord.
|
